October 31, 2025
Paint Wars: 1999 Strikes Back
Why Should I Care What Color the Bikeshed Is?
Because a 1999 rant still sparks fights over tiny choices—and the comments are chaos
TLDR: A classic 1999 essay about “bikeshedding” — arguing loudly over trivial choices — resurfaced and set off fresh debate. Commenters split between nostalgia and warnings that the term can silence useful feedback, making it a timely reminder for how we run meetings and make group decisions today.
The internet just rediscovered the classic “bikeshedding” rant—where people argue loudly about tiny, easy-to-understand stuff (like paint colors) while ignoring the hard, important work—and the comments are having a field day. Fans cheered the return of this evergreen lesson from Poul‑Henning Kamp’s FreeBSD FAQ and his saga, with one user giggling that it’s been posted “at least 10 times” over the years, while another dryly dropped a one-word reminder: “(1999)”. The vibe? Equal parts nostalgia and “please show this to my manager.” As a refresher, the essay says: the simpler the decision, the louder the noise—a rule many swear they see in every meeting.
But the drama got juicy when a commenter surfaced a rebuttal from Brett Glass—the programmer called out in the original piece—arguing that dismissing ideas as “bikeshedding” can be just as damaging as taking too many bad suggestions. That sparked a split: some want the term exported beyond tech because it names a universal office problem, while others warn it’s become a lazy shut‑down button for criticism. Meanwhile, the thread memed itself: old‑link bingo, “1999” mic drops, and proud confessions like “favorite term since I started coding.” Even ACM hosts Kamp’s column, The Bikeshed, because apparently we’ll be painting this shed forever—together, and very loudly.
Key Points
- •The article defines “bikeshedding” via the FreeBSD FAQ and associated references.
- •Short answer: one should not care about the “color of the bikeshed,” i.e., trivial details.
- •Longer explanation: having the ability to comment does not justify blocking others over minor preferences.
- •The article notes that discussion noise often increases as the complexity of a change decreases.
- •It provides links to historical background by Poul-Henning Kamp and to ACM Queue for further reading.