Collatz-Weyl Generators: Pseudorandom Number Generators

From 3x+1 to “random”: new number maker sparks hype, side‑eye, and meme wars

TLDR: Researchers unveiled a fast, tiny “Collatz‑Weyl” random number generator that reportedly passes tough tests. The community is split: developers cheer the speed and multi‑stream design, while security folks warn test results aren’t proof of safety, demanding audits before anyone uses it for crypto.

A new “Collatz‑Weyl” number maker just dropped, blending the viral 3x+1 math puzzle with neat number patterns called Weyl sequences, and the devs say it aces tough randomness tests used by standards folks. They’re bragging about speed, tiny code, and lots of independent streams, hinting at possible security uses. Cue the internet: half the comments are confetti, half are caution tape. Fans cheer that this could turbocharge simulations and games, while skeptics clutch their coffee and chant, “Passing tests isn’t proof of security.” One popular line: don’t roll your own crypto. Another: Collatz eventually goes to 1—does my luck do the same? The thread is a festival of memes: “My portfolio follows Collatz,” “seed = 69, results: nice,” and “BigCrush sounds like my last breakup.” Hardware folks drool over potential tiny ASIC chips, while data scientists love the multiple streams pitch for massive Monte Carlo runs. Meanwhile, crypto nerds insist on external audits and say “PRNG” (software random) isn’t “CSPRNG” (crypto‑safe random) until proven. Comparisons to PCG, xoshiro, and even the classic Mersenne Twister fly. The vibe: exciting math magic with a side of spicy skepticism—plus jokes for days.

Key Points

  • Collatz-Weyl Generators are introduced as a family of uniform PRNGs.
  • They are based on generalized Collatz mappings derived from the Collatz conjecture and Weyl sequences.
  • The generators reportedly pass stringent randomness tests used by research and standardization communities.
  • They are designed for high throughput and low latency with small code and/or ASIC size.
  • They support multiple independent streams and have potential for cryptographic applications.

Hottest takes

"Passing tests isn’t the same as surviving attackers—cool toy, not crypto" — crypt0grim
"3x+1 RNG? Love it. Finally math chaos I can ship on microcontrollers" — bitBarn
"If it goes to 1, does my password go to 0?" — punnyPenguin
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.