Lessons from 70 interviews on deploying AI Agents in production

Buff Clippy vs Broken Reality: “Think small” meets “show me results”

TLDR: The study says AI agents win by starting small, proving value, and keeping humans involved. Commenters clap back: demos are easy, reliable results are hard, errors multiply, and businesses want predictable, audit‑friendly workflows—so the gap between hype and reality is the real story.

Microsoft’s bosses joke Copilot is “Clippy after a decade at the gym,” but the crowd isn’t swooning—they’re side–eyeing. After 70 interviews across startups and big companies, the article says the secret sauce is start tiny, prove ROI, keep humans in the loop, and call it a co‑pilot, not a replacement. Founders say the blockers aren’t coding problems; it’s getting AI into real workflows, budgets, and expectations. Pricing? Hybrid and per‑task dominate, while outcome‑based is the unicorn only 3% touch. Accuracy hovers around “good enough” for simple tasks.

Cue the comments: advikipedia backs the “it’s not technical” angle, while jakozaur drops a harsh reality check—“killer demos” are easy, real delivery is hard, and tiny mistakes snowball until a human has to babysit. donatj asks the brutal question: aside from “replacing developers,” what’s actually useful when tools “make stuff up”? reedf1 demands 100% auditable and deterministic (predictable) workflows, calling AI “technically chaotic.” And arisAlexis throws cold water: today’s lessons won’t matter in six months.

Meanwhile, the memes are loud: “Swole Clippy” bench‑pressing spreadsheets, “Agents ghosting tasks,” and “human‑in‑the‑loop” rebranded as “adult supervision.” The mood? Entertained but skeptical. Founders preach Education, Entertainment, Expectation management, while the crowd says Explain, Deliver, Don’t BS. The drama is real—and very clickable.

Key Points

  • The study surveyed 30+ European agentic AI startup founders and interviewed 40+ enterprise practitioners to build a deployment playbook.
  • Main deployment blockers are organizational, not technical; successful teams start with small, low-risk, verifiable tasks to show ROI and position agents as copilots.
  • 62% of startups tap Line of Business or core spend budgets, indicating movement beyond experimentation.
  • Pricing remains unsettled: Hybrid and Per Task models are most common (23% each), while Outcome-based pricing is rare (3%) due to attribution and measurement challenges.
  • 52% build agentic infrastructure in-house; over 90% report at least 70% accuracy, with healthcare highest, and medium accuracy acceptable for low-risk, verifiable, or novel-capability use cases.

Hottest takes

“it’s been so easy to build a killer demo, but why has it been so hard to get agents that actually deliver the goods” — jakozaur
“Outside of ‘replacing developers’, I am genuinely curious what have people done that’s actually useful?” — donatj
“What you actually need in most business cases is a 100% auditable, explainable and deterministic workflow” — reedf1
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.