Are We Ready to Be Governed by Artificial Intelligence?

From denied doctors to robo-judges: who’s really in charge of AI government

TLDR: AI now helps decide medical approvals and even court interpretations, sparking a fierce split: try it because humans fail, or slam the brakes on “vibe-coded” law. Commenters warn the real rulers would be those who own and train the AI, making control and accountability the core issue.

Today’s plot twist: AI isn’t a sci‑fi overlord—it’s already creeping through the halls of power. The article lays it out: health insurers use algorithms to approve or deny care, and new moves at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) could even reward fast AI‑powered rejections. Judges, from Colombia to D.C., are quietly asking chatbots for help interpreting laws—sometimes without telling anyone. The comments? A full‑blown balcony brawl. One camp cheers, “Humans are terrible at governing—let the machines try,” while the other slams the brakes with “Do not vibe‑code the law.” That phrase instantly became the thread’s meme, with users picturing traffic tickets written by a horoscope. Another hot take: we won’t be ruled by AI, we’ll be ruled by whoever owns and trains it—cue corporate puppet master jokes. The inevitability crowd shrugged: the genie’s out, better get ready. Meanwhile, someone casually dropped a link like a grenade, sending the debate into round two. Whether it’s faster prior‑auths or faster denials, robot “second opinions” in court, or invisible AI advisors, the community’s mood is a tie between cautious curiosity and full‑on nope. The real cliffhanger: who holds the off switch?

Key Points

  • AI is already embedded across government functions, including executive administration and judicial interpretation.
  • Private insurers in Medicare Advantage use algorithms to make coverage decisions, with CMS guidance under the Biden administration allowing such AI use.
  • The article reports the Trump administration reversed AI guardrails for Medicare Advantage and limited states’ ability to impose protections.
  • CMS introduced a program incentivizing vendors to use AI to rapidly reject prior authorization requests deemed wasteful.
  • Courts in multiple countries, including the U.S., have begun using AI tools; examples include a Colombian judge (2023), Judge Kevin Newsom (2024), and the DC Court of Appeals using ChatGPT (2025).

Hottest takes

"Honestly, given how terrible humans are at it, I'm down for giving it a try." — jfengel
"I do not want vibe-coding the law" — AnimalMuppet
"are we willing to be governed by the people who own AI?" — Eddy_Viscosity2
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.