January 6, 2026

Bots, jobs, and spicy comments

Why agents matter more than other AI

Internet erupts over 'agents replace workers' claim; coders roll eyes

TLDR: An essay says autonomous AI “agents” will reshape office work, pointing to coding bots building apps and big user spending. Commenters push back: it’s artificial general intelligence hype, too code‑centric, and oddly anti‑human; others say it’s just computers all over again, making the stakes—and the skepticism—hard to ignore.

Josh Albrecht’s piece claims AI “agents”—bots that run tools to hit a goal—will matter more than every other kind of AI, pointing to coding agents that now crank out full apps and gobble $1K/day from power users. Cue the comment cage match. Skeptics like zeroonetwothree rolled their eyes: this is just the old “if we get artificial general intelligence, everything changes” take—been said for decades. zkmon called agents outside code “undersold,” dubbing them “solutions searching for problems.” The vibe: cool demos, unclear real-world demand.

The snark came fast. crims0n joked you could replace “AI agent” with “computer” and get the same breathless essay—like your grandpa’s 1970s tech pitch in a new hoodie. nvader dropped a link to previous threads, basically saying we’ve had this fight already. Then a line in the article sparked HR-level drama: praising agents for having “no motivation,” to just grind out tasks. tangotaylor shot back, “I am glad I don’t work for this person,” igniting a mini debate about dehumanizing worker attitudes.

Fans of coding bots cheered the Geometry Wars clone story; critics asked: great, but can an agent run a business, file taxes, or manage customers? The crowd remains split—and very loud.

Key Points

  • The article argues that AI agents—systems that run tools in a loop to achieve goals—are the most consequential AI type for the future of knowledge work.
  • Non-agent generative AI is constrained by human attention, whereas agents are limited primarily by compute (spending).
  • The author contends there is substantial pent-up demand for knowledge work beyond job postings due to hiring overhead and labor costs.
  • Coding agents are presented as a current, practical example, having advanced from small scripts to full small projects and websites over the past year.
  • The author cites Imbue’s Sculptor platform and reports of strong revenue and user spend at Cursor and Lovable (some users >$1,000/day) as evidence of momentum.

Hottest takes

"solutions searching for problems" — zkmon
"replace 'AI agent' with 'computer'" — crims0n
"I am glad I don't work for this person" — tangotaylor
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.