How to Code Claude Code in 200 Lines of Code

Build an AI coder in 200 lines? Devs say not so fast

TLDR: A post says you can make a basic AI coding helper in ~200 lines using simple file tools. The crowd split: skeptics say modern assistants need complex guardrails and TODO tricks, one dev flaunted a 70-line version, and jokes flew—making clear it’s simple on paper, messy in practice.

An article claims you can build a coding assistant—the kind that edits your files and writes code—using roughly 200 lines of Python and three basic tools: read, list, and edit. Sounds like AI magic, deconstructed, right? The loop is simple: you ask, the model suggests a tool, your program runs it, the model reacts. But the comments quickly turned this tidy picture into a full-on internet food fight.

The hottest take came fast: prodigycorp argued this mental model is already outdated, saying modern assistants are way more complex than a simple loop. Meanwhile, kirjavascript swaggered in with a flex: “I did it in 70 lines,” dropping nanoagent.js and fanning the minimalist flames. Then nyellin poured cold water on the “it’s easy” vibe, warning about early stopping—agents quitting before a task is done—and saying “reasoning models” (fancy models that try to think step-by-step) don’t actually fix it. The solution? Extra harness tricks like injecting TODOs. Translation for non-nerds: you need more than a tiny script to keep the robot focused.

And because it’s the internet, someone tossed in a mysterious YouTube, and ulaw’s tongue twister stole the show: “How many Claudes could Claude Code code…?” Minimal code, maximum chaos—and maximum comments.

Key Points

  • The article outlines a simple agent loop where an LLM requests tool calls, a local program executes them, and results are returned to the LLM.
  • A minimal coding agent can be built with three tools: read files, list files, and edit files.
  • The LLM does not directly access the filesystem; the harness mediates all actions via structured tool calls.
  • Python scaffolding includes environment loading, an Anthropic client instantiation, colorized terminal output, and path resolution utilities.
  • Tool implementations return structured data to inform the LLM, with edit_file supporting file creation or in-file string replacement.

Hottest takes

"not even close to an accurate mental model" — prodigycorp
"You’d think you can solve this with reasoning models... it doesn’t actually work" — nyellin
"How many Claudes could Claude Code code if Claude Code could code Claude?" — ulaw
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.