January 14, 2026
Age-gate rage!
So, You've Hit an Age Gate. What Now?
EFF says share less, while commenters scream VPNs, fake IDs, and meme warfare
TLDR: EFF opposes age-verification rules and offers a guide to minimize what data you share when you’re forced to verify. Commenters are split between VPN escape plans, ad-blocker bravado, skepticism about big platforms, and jokes about fake IDs—highlighting real privacy fears and everyday frustration.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation just dropped a guide for people stuck behind age gates, and the crowd went off like a fire alarm. EFF’s stance is clear: age checks are risky and often biased, so share the least data possible. Their resource hub walks you through options and warns that face scans can misjudge people—especially people of color, trans and nonbinary folks, and those with disabilities—and that some vendors (like Yoti) even send your photo to their servers. Cue the comments section chaos. One camp yelled “just use a VPN,” treating age gates like a speed bump. Another proudly confessed they never click cookie banners and plan to nuke age checks the same way. A third crowd wondered—only half joking—if teens are already sharing one “throwaway identity” like a bootleg Netflix login. Meanwhile, a frustrated skeptic says the rumor that Google magically skips age checks is “proven false,” noting the thousands still stuck verifying. And for comic relief? A perfectly unhelpful hack: “Face scan: download Gary’s mod.” The vibes: privacy paranoia, anti-surveillance swagger, meme-fueled rebellion, and a whole lot of distrust. EFF’s message is careful and practical; the internet’s reaction is loud, messy, and very online.
Key Points
- •EFF opposes age-gating and age verification mandates but provides guidance for users subject to them.
- •The article recommends submitting the minimum data necessary due to the risk of leaks.
- •Users should assess verification options by Data, Access, Retention, Audits, and Visibility.
- •Facial age estimation is commonly used but has accuracy problems, especially for marginalized users.
- •Vendor implementations differ: Private ID and k-ID use on-device checks; Yoti processes images on servers, increasing leakage and visibility risks.