LLMs as Language Compilers: Lessons from Fortran for the Future of Coding

From punch cards to robot chimps, devs feud over AI taking the wheel

TLDR: LLMs are being hyped as coding factories that can build apps fast, echoing past leaps like Fortran. The comments split between “it’s fiction,” “AI might crack hard problems,” and “it’s making a mess”—a fight that matters for jobs, skills, and who gets to shape the future of software.

The article pitches a bold vision: today’s large language models (LLMs) aren’t just chatty—they’re turning into robot chimps that can build entire apps and maybe whole teams’ worth of work. The author says coding agents helped whip up a full iOS prototype in an afternoon, but also tells a cringe story where the bot insisted on the wrong setting like a stubborn intern. Cue the comments: half jaw-dropped, half eye-rolled. One skeptic snarked that claims of “team-scale” output are fiction, while others argued this is the dawn of a new era where Stack Overflow is out and AI copilots are in.

Then the real fight broke out over complexity. One camp says accidental complexity—the busywork and glue code—is falling fast, and wonders if AI can tackle the essential hard stuff next. Another fires back that accidental complexity is actually skyrocketing, because cajoling a bot without theory just spawns more mess. A history buff waves the Fortran flag, reminding everyone that when computing gets cheaper, it gets democratized—gatekeepers always get humbled. Meanwhile, the community turned Steven Yegge’s [Gas Town] meme into a running joke: super-smart chimps who can “wreck your stuff” in seconds. Between “robot chimp” riffs and “philosophical zombie” zingers, the thread was equal parts future-shock and roast session.

Key Points

  • New Stack Overflow posts declined by 77% since 2022 as developers increasingly use ChatGPT and coding agents.
  • Coding agents enabled rapid prototype development, including an iOS app where agents built the entire front-end.
  • Agents showed limitations, such as fixating on an incorrect parameter when adding an SSL certificate path.
  • Steven Yegge’s "Gas Town" is cited as a provocative vision of industrialized agent-based coding.
  • Historical parallels: early 1950s programming was labor-intensive; UNIVAC-1 predicted Eisenhower’s win; SAGE required vast assembly code and staff; MIT’s Laning–Zierler system traded abstraction for 5–10× performance penalties.

Hottest takes

“Ah, a work of fiction” — chrisjj
“what if AI is better at tackling essential complexity too?” — slopusila
“I think the accidental complexity is through the roof” — conartist6
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.