February 12, 2026
AI or I? Choose your fighter
I was insulted today – AI style
Coworker asks if a robot wrote it—cue outrage, jokes, and an energy-use nerd-off
TLDR: A worker’s polished intro sparked drama when a coworker asked if AI wrote it. Comments exploded into outrage over the “AI accusation,” jokes that the post itself sounds robotic, and a nerdy debate on energy use—showing how suspicion of AI is now a normal (and spicy) part of office life.
An office proofread turned spicy when a coworker praised an opening paragraph, then casually asked, “Did you run it through AI?” Cue meltdown—and the internet loved it. The community split into camps: Team Human Pride, shouting that assuming machine-made words is the new insult, and Team Shrug, who think asking about AI is just today’s version of “did you copy that?” Bigfishrunning weaponized it with a memorable burn: “Your paragraph seems statistically very likely… did you consult the database?” Meanwhile, the nerds showed up with a plot twist—stavros turned it into a mini energy drama: who burns more watt-hours, a human or a large language model (LLM)? That’s right: outrage meets climate math.
Then came the meta-jokes. Jansan deadpanned, “Hope it wasn’t written by AI.” Kachapopopow pointed at the long dash in the title like it was a crime scene clue: is this whole post secretly a robot? And mewse-hn claimed the writer’s “no super-computer needed” line is a classic ChatGPT verbal tick, turning the rant into a possible AI self-own. The vibe: fear of bland, statistical prose vs. the normalization of asking ‘robot or human?’ Plus, a fresh meme born—calling someone’s writing “statistically very likely” is the new office mic drop.
Key Points
- •The author was asked to proofread a colleague’s report and offer feedback.
- •He suggested adding an introductory summary paragraph and provided a draft.
- •The colleague praised the paragraph and then asked if it was generated by AI.
- •The author was angered by the implication and clarified the text was his own work.
- •The article reflects on growing assumptions that AI is used to produce everyday writing.