Ask HN: How to measure how much data one can effectively process or understand?

Forget big data — the crowd wants smarter shortcuts and faster feedback

TLDR: The thread asked for a way to measure real understanding of data, pushing a scale focused on insight, speed, and relationships. Commenters argued it’s not bytes but brains: actionable feedback loops and cognitive limits beat raw volume, with jokes about tabs and 'cardio for your brain.'

Hacker News asked how to measure how much data a person can truly understand, and the comments turned into a lively group therapy session. The original post pitched a “data Kardashev” that scores smart abstraction — how fast you turn info into insight, how well you compress ideas, and how many relationships you can juggle at once. kellkell doubled down with “humans process compressed representations,” basically shouting “quality over quantity,” while people riffed that the real metric is vibes per minute.

Then mikewarot went full professor: it’s not the pile, it’s the density and whether your brain matches the signal — dropping the killer line about grand theories being useless if you don’t understand them. allinonetools_ lit up the pragmatists: the limit is action, not storage; clearer, faster feedback loops mean you can actually use the data. mbuda swooped in with receipts and a deep dive, turning the thread into homework. The mini-drama: new tools like Agentic Runtimes and GraphRAG — think helpers that link related info and remember context — aren’t just “more data,” they promise a better mental map. The crowd’s mood: stop flexing terabytes, start measuring insight. Bonus meme: “Throughput is cardio for your brain.” Case closed.

Key Points

  • The Kardashev scale measures energy control and is not suited for assessing information processing.
  • Effective data processing should be evaluated by abstraction capacity, not raw data volume.
  • Humans process compressed representations, focusing on insight extraction rather than direct raw data ingestion.
  • A proposed metric includes throughput, compression efficiency, and relational depth as core dimensions.
  • Agentic Runtimes and GraphRAG are cited as tools that expand relational modeling capacity and contextual memory.

Hottest takes

"Humans don’t process data directly — we process compressed representations." — kellkell
"a correct grand unified theory isn't useful if you don't know the physics to understand it" — mikewarot
"the limit isn’t how much data exists but how much you can turn into action without friction" — allinonetools_
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.