February 20, 2026
Court says no. Comments say GO!
Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court
Tariffs tossed, comment war erupts: jobs vs refunds vs 'nothing will happen'
TLDR: The Supreme Court killed Trump’s global tariffs, which were imposed using an emergency law without Congress. Commenters are split between jobs-first tariffs, anger over business whiplash, fears of lasting damage, and cynicism over refunds or accountability—asking if importers get paid back or if nothing really changes.
Big swing from the bench today: the US Supreme Court just struck down Donald Trump’s global tariffs, the import taxes he launched last year by declaring an “emergency” under a 1977 law to skip Congress. An appeals court had already called most of them illegal, but kept them alive; the White House asked the justices to rescue them, and got a hard no. The comments lit up like a fireworks factory. Pro-tariff voices say this kneecaps factories and proves Wall Street “isn’t the only America,” while others cheer a check on presidential power. One exhausted small-biz vibe dominates: please, no more whiplash policy.
Then came the drama. Some say “the global damage is done” and it’s too late to rebuild trust, with one user even spiraling to “US–Iran war feels inevitable” levels. Pragmatists ask the money question: do importers get refunds, or is this another saga where “illegal” means nothing actually happens? Jokes flew about tariff “boomerangs,” refund speedruns, and getting a Customs check with a “sorry” sticky note. There’s even a semi-related link for anyone who loves a rabbit hole. Bottom line: court says stop, the economy says now what, and the internet says… fight!
Key Points
- •The US Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s global tariffs imposed last year.
- •The Trump administration used the 1977 IEEPA to declare an emergency and implement tariffs without Congressional approval.
- •A US appeals court ruled in August 2025 that most of the tariffs were illegal but allowed them to remain in place.
- •The Supreme Court became involved after the White House sought to overturn the appeals court decision.
- •Details of the Supreme Court’s ruling are being reviewed, with more updates pending.