Canvas_ity: A tiny, single-header <canvas>-like 2D rasterizer for C++

Tiny C++ canvas lands; commenters shout 'vibes vs. craft'

TLDR: A tiny C++ library brings browser-style Canvas drawing to apps with a focus on quality over speed. Commenters split between calling it “vibe-coded,” defending the craft, demanding WebAssembly benchmarks, and questioning the one-file design—proof that a small tool can spark big opinions.

A bite-size C++ art tool just dropped: a single-file library that draws shapes and text like the HTML5 Canvas you see in your browser, but inside regular apps. It prioritizes picture-perfect results over raw speed and even blends colors more accurately, which can make shading look slightly different from what browsers show. That’s the news—now the drama. One early quip — “vibe-coded?” — set the tone, accusing the project of being more aesthetic than engineered. Cue the clapback: another commenter called the thread “embarrassing,” blasting lazy drive‑by snark and praising the work. Meanwhile, the practical crowd wants receipts: compile it to WebAssembly (WASM) and do a side‑by‑side showdown for speed and accuracy. Others got fixated on the format: why is it “header‑only” with a macro to pull in the implementation? (Think of it like a pack‑and‑go file to keep setup easy.) On the wholesome side, a recommended reading list in the issue tracker earned teacher’s‑pet points, with one user saying it “looks great” and dropping a link. The vibe vs. rigor meme, the WASM bake‑off challenge, and the header‑only nitpick turned a tiny graphics library into a full‑on comment section canvas — and everyone’s painting in bold strokes.

Key Points

  • Canvas_ity is a single-header C++ library for immediate-mode 2D vector graphics modeled on the W3C HTML5 2D canvas spec.
  • It prioritizes high-quality rendering, ease of use, and compact size, with speed secondary and no quality–speed tradeoff options.
  • It supports nearly all of the W3C 2D canvas features except hit regions and reading certain properties, with C++-adapted API differences.
  • An automated C++ test suite and an HTML5 port map APIs and compare rendering against browser implementations for validation.
  • An example demonstrates path operations, fills, strokes, dashes, joins, caps, gradients, shadows, compositing, and outputs a TGA image; gamma-correct blending causes slight shading differences vs browsers.

Hottest takes

"vibe-coded?" — ranger_danger
"Isn’t it ironic to imply laziness..." — msephton
"why this is a header only implementation" — ddtaylor
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.