How Important Was the Battle of Hastings?

Was 1066 a big deal? Comments turn into a history brawl

TLDR: Historians say Hastings (1066) was England’s last foreign conquest, replacing elites, taxes, and culture. The comments split between “overhyped blip” and “civilization reboot,” with alt-history “What if Harold won?” riffs and Brexit jokes showing why this battle still shapes identity today.

Historians brought the heat: one professor calls Hastings the last time England was conquered, another dubs the Norman takeover a “Brexit in reverse”—complete with wiped-out aristocrats, castle-building, crushing taxes, and stone cathedrals shipped in from Normandy. But the real fireworks were in the comments, where the crowd split into Team rewrote England vs Team overhyped blip. Counterfactual fan ggm kicked off the chaos with “What if Harold had won?” while jongjong argued wars change menus and tax bills more than nations, sparking eye-rolls and clapbacks. somewhereoutth came in hot, saying the English class system was literally born here—Normans replaced the ruling class and left a lasting split. vondur went full hype mode: Normans weren’t just invaders; they were “serious bad asses,” pointing to Sicily and a near-run at the Byzantine Empire, plus a plug for the “Norman Centuries” podcast. Meanwhile, atombender dropped an archive link like a drive-by fact grenade. Memes flew: “Brexit in reverse” became jokes about French menus invading and “castle DLC.” Bottom line: is Hastings a civilization reboot or just another tax hike? The thread’s verdict: the past is messy—and the hot takes are spicier than Norman mustard.

Key Points

  • Tom Licence argues 1066 was England’s last successful foreign conquest and catalyzed shifts toward Norman customs and politics.
  • Norman ambitions to subjugate England predated William, with precedents under Dukes Richard II and Robert I, but only William realized them.
  • England had already experienced Danish conquests in 1014 and 1016; Norman replacement of the Anglo-Danish elite reoriented ties from Denmark to Normandy and increased burdens on commoners.
  • During the 1940 invasion threat, Churchill and others invoked 1066; later threats (Armada, Napoleon, Hitler) failed to replicate William’s success.
  • Elisabeth van Houts details European scorn for William’s killing of a legitimate king, Harold, critiques the perjury claim, and outlines harsh consolidation: aristocratic elimination, castle-building, punitive taxes, land confiscations, and grand church rebuilding with Norman stone.

Hottest takes

"people do seem to overestimate the impact of losing a war." — jongjong
"The English class system is anchored in this event" — somewhereoutth
"The Normans were some serious bad asses" — vondur
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.