No leap second will be introduced at the end of June 2026

No leap second in June—devs breathe, critics yell “abolish time tweaks”

TLDR: Timekeepers say there’s no extra second added in June 2026, so clocks won’t hiccup. Commenters split between abolishing leap seconds to avoid brittle edge cases and keeping them for sky-accurate time, with surprise that it’s a manual decision and chatter about a possible future “negative” leap second.

Paris timekeepers just said there’s no leap second coming at the end of June 2026, and the internet did what it does best: argue. Curious onlookers like wlkr confessed they thought these things were routine, then went down the Wikipedia rabbit hole. Others exhaled—no infamous “:60” to break logs this summer—but the relief quickly turned into a brawl over whether leap seconds should exist at all.

On one side: the “kill it with fire” crowd. Vvector thundered that leap seconds are a burden for 99.9% of people and “astronomers can use an offset.” On the other: infrastructure veterans warning that time is the ultimate booby trap. imglorp summed it up: rare events become nasty corner cases, which is exactly why they wreck systems. Meanwhile, SeanDav learned the hard truth—there’s no neat formula for this; humans decide if Earth’s spin drifts enough. And just to spice the pot, throw0101d resurfaced talk of a future negative leap second—yes, skipping a second entirely—with an NPR explainer.

Between cries of “accuracy for astronomers” vs “stop breaking computers,” the memes rolled in: Earth “skipped leg day,” “no :60 DLC this summer,” and “patch notes: time unchanged.” No extra second, extra drama.

Key Points

  • IERS Bulletin C 71 confirms no leap second will be added at the end of June 2026.
  • The UTC–TAI offset remains −37 seconds, unchanged since January 1, 2017.
  • Leap seconds may be introduced at the end of December or June based on UT1−TAI evolution.
  • Bulletin C is issued every six months to announce or confirm leap second actions.
  • The notice is signed by Christian Bizouard, Director of the IERS Earth Orientation Center at the Observatoire de Paris, France.

Hottest takes

"Leap Seconds need to be abolished... huge burden, for no gain." — Vvector
"I assumed that leap seconds could be determined algorithmically... This is a bit of a can of worms..." — SeanDav
"The complexity goes up tremendously if some condition is rarely encountered: eg leap second." — imglorp
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.