Stop Sloppypasta

Work chats revolt against lazy bot walls

TLDR: Sloppypasta — unedited chatbot replies pasted into work threads — just got called out as rude and time-wasting. Commenters split between cheering new etiquette, arguing “ChatGPT says” isn’t LMGTFY, and doubting offenders will change, while others ask how to push back politely without office drama.

Work chat just got a new villain: sloppypasta — those lazy, copy‑pasted chatbot walls of text dropped into threads without reading or tailoring. The rant’s author, namnnumbr, coined the term and called it rude because it forces the recipient to do the thinking the sender skipped. Think “Eager Beaver” pasting generic tips or the “OrAIcle” reply that begins with “ChatGPT says.” For the uninitiated: LLM means “large language model,” and LMGTFY means “Let Me Google That For You.” The vibe in the comments? Fed‑up, funny, and divided.

Enter the drama: stabbles says “ChatGPT says” isn’t the same as LMGTFY — one is worshipping the machine, the other is telling you to do your own homework. uniq7 wants a script for shutting down sloppypasta without starting an office cold war. It got spicy fast. Meanwhile, madrox goes full cynic: the offenders won’t read this, and humans have never had good tools to manage the flood. Reality bites. Jokes flew — pasta puns, “no slop Fridays,” and em‑dash confetti — while incognito124 dropped a related link. Verdict from the crowd: sloppypasta feels like digital litter. Others shrugged and kept scrolling. Whether we can actually stop it? That’s where the fight is.

Key Points

  • The article defines “sloppypasta” as verbatim, unreviewed, and unrequested LLM output pasted into communications.
  • It argues the practice is rude due to asymmetric effort, shifting validation and relevance-checking to recipients.
  • Common settings include Slack/Teams messages, emails, and tags in Notion or Office documents.
  • The “Eager Beaver” example shows well-intentioned but generic AI text derailing active discussions by ignoring specifics.
  • The “OrAIcle” example equates “ChatGPT says…” answers to LMGTFY-like etiquette failures that avoid personal expertise.

Hottest takes

"Tired of people at work pasting raw ChatGPT output into chats" — namnnumbr
"I wouldn't call \"ChatGPT says\" an equivalent of LMGTFY" — stabbles
"The people doing this kind of thing are not the kind of people to be reading this manifesto" — madrox
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.