March 23, 2026
Pretty privilege crashes
Attractive students no longer receive better results as classes moved online
“Pretty privilege” flops on Zoom – except for the guys, and everyone has opinions
TLDR: A study claims attractive students only got better grades in person, and when classes went online the boost vanished for women but oddly lingered for men. Commenters are split between blaming bias, praising exam-only systems like China’s, mocking the tiny study, and arguing over beauty, brains, and unfair advantages.
A new study says that when classes moved online during Covid, attractive students stopped getting better grades… unless they were men. In real-life classrooms, good-looking guys and girls both seemed to get a boost, especially in chatty, non-math subjects. But once teaching went remote, only the “handsome dude bonus” survived, while women’s so‑called beauty edge disappeared. And that’s where the comment section absolutely exploded.
One user went straight for the gender plot twist, wondering why the male advantage stuck around while women’s didn’t, basically asking, “So we turned off cameras and only male pretty privilege survived?” Another commenter swerved hard in a different direction, praising China’s brutal national exam, the Gaokao, as the only way to dodge all this bias: no charm, no looks, just test scores and tears.
Others tried to calm the drama, suggesting it’s less about being hot and more about social skills: maybe the charismatic kids just work the room better. Then a skeptic barged in with the classic “replication crisis” warning, rolling their eyes at yet another small, flashy study about looks and success. And just when things were getting thoughtful, someone dropped a spicy genetics comment about “specific genetic pools” for high intelligence, instantly turning the thread into a beauty–brains–bias cage match. The science may be cautious, but the community? Absolutely not.
Key Points
- •Study analyzes the link between student facial attractiveness and grades among Swedish engineering students.
- •In in‑person instruction, attractive students received higher grades in non‑quantitative, interaction‑heavy courses.
- •The in‑person beauty premium applied to both male and female students.
- •After the shift to online teaching during COVID‑19, attractive females’ grades in non‑quantitative subjects declined.
- •A beauty premium for male students persisted in remote instruction, suggesting discrimination may explain female in‑person premium.