April 14, 2026

Feud‑alism erupts in the comments

Civilization Is Not the Default. Violence Is

Crowd brawls over Rome, feudalism, and who gets to keep the peace

TLDR: The piece says peace—and a dominant power enforcing rules—built civilization after Rome’s chaos. Commenters erupted: some mocked that as violence in a nicer suit, others blasted U.S. hypocrisy, while a few called for a matrilineal reboot—raising big questions about who creates safety and at what cost.

A history post arguing that peace (and a monopoly on force) made civilization possible lit the fuse—and the comments went full medieval. The article races from Rome’s fall to the feudal free‑for‑all, then the Church’s “Peace of God” and trade revival—basically, when swords quiet down, coins start clinking. But the crowd? Split. One cynic sneered, “that’s what all the monkeys think,” as others riffed on the old line that order is just violence with paperwork. Cue memes about a “Monopoly: Feudal Edition”—collect 200 coins if your bridge isn’t on fire—and the Church’s truce as medieval Do Not Disturb.

Then the hot takes piled up. A Taoist‑tinged voice warned that ruling by fear always backfires, while another commenter proposed a total reboot: ditch patriarchy and reboot society along matrilineal, nonbinary, animist lines. Geopolitics crashed the party too, with users arguing the U.S. didn’t spread peace so much as pick winners, citing dictatorships propped up when convenient. Others got nerdy: Christianity moderating Rome, the Church as “the rump of the empire,” and whatifalthist name‑drops sparked side debates about Western bias. Love it or hate it, the thread’s core fight is clear: civilization needs peace—but is that peace earned by trust, enforced by power, or rebuilt from the ground up? For context, see Marc Bloch and the Peace of God.

Key Points

  • After Rome’s collapse, the Carolingian Empire under Charlemagne lacked institutional depth and, alongside external invasions, failed to sustain centralized power.
  • The first feudal age (c. 860–1050) saw fragmentation, violence, population decline, infrastructure decay, and collapse of coin-based trade, pushing communities toward local, kinship-based governance and customary law.
  • Stabilization followed as Muslims were driven from Spain, Vikings integrated into conquered regions, and Hungarians settled; the Church’s Peace and Truce of God sought to curb violence in the 11th century.
  • The second feudal age (c. 1050–1200) featured demographic and commercial recovery, translation of Roman and Muslim works, and a revival of Roman Law studies in universities like Bologna, enabling increased administrative focus.
  • Rising trade restored coin circulation, allowing rulers to replace land payments with wages and build salaried bureaucracies; alliances between burgesses and monarchs helped reestablish centralized order, leading to larger kingdoms and emerging national identities. Trust and a monopoly on violence enabled public goods and commerce.

Hottest takes

"thats what all the monkeys think" — metalman
"the US has not dominated by peace" — ks2048
"return to the matrilineal, matrifocal ways" — crawfordcomeaux
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.