Wikipedia's AI Policy

Editors say ‘no’ to robot-written pages; commenters split between panic and pragmatism

TLDR: Wikipedia is blocking AI-written articles and images, fast-deleting bot-like pages, and rejecting AI as a source to protect trust. Comments split between fear of a slippery slope and “use AI carefully anyway,” with some blasting deletionism while others quietly co-pilot edits with human review.

Wikipedia just slammed the brakes on robot writers. The site’s new guidance says no to large language models (LLMs) churning out or rewriting articles, with tiny carve-outs for basic copyedits and careful translation by humans. Pages that look auto-written can be zapped fast under G15, AI-made images are off-limits—especially for real people—and machine-made “sources” don’t count as reliable (policy). Even talk pages can hide obvious bot-chatter (guideline). See the full explainer here: Wikipedia’s AI page and the LLM rule itself (WP:LLM).

The comment section? A reality TV reunion. One camp is clutching pearls over a “slippery slope” to chaos, warning that if AI sneaks in, trust slides out. Another camp thinks this is the least-bad option, but with a wink: they’re still using AI as a helper—drafting tweaks from real sources, then double-checking with multiple models, human-brain on top. The drama heats up when critics drag Wikipedia’s long-running “deletionist” vibe, predicting more trigger-happy nukes of legit edits. Meanwhile, meme-lords joked that “robots just got grounded by the hall monitors,” and users cheered: Humans 1, Robots 0—for now. Expect more fireworks as pragmatists quietly co-pilot with AI while rule hawks patrol the skies

Key Points

  • This is an information page summarizing AI-related norms on English Wikipedia; it is not a binding policy.
  • Using LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited, with narrow exceptions for basic copyediting and translation under strict human review.
  • As of March 2026, pages plausibly generated by LLMs without reasonable human review can be speedily deleted (G15).
  • AI-generated images are prohibited, with specific restrictions for biographies of living persons; AI upscaling is discouraged.
  • AI-generated content should not be cited as reliable sources, and obviously AI-generated talk page comments may be struck or collapsed.

Hottest takes

Will this become a slippery slope if it gets out of control — DropDead
Wikiedia already can't manage their deletionist problem — josefritzishere
I'm still using AI to write articles lol — esbranson
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.