AI can cost more than human workers now

Commenters: Hire a human, save a fortune — “tokens” aren’t cheap

TLDR: Companies are spending so much on AI that it can cost more than employee salaries, with some budgets already blown on token fees. Commenters are roasting the hype, saying humans may be cheaper, AI is inefficient, and without clear productivity gains, pricey bots could become a boardroom liability.

The internet is clutching its pearls over the price tag of AI. After Nvidia’s Bryan Catanzaro admitted compute bills outpace staff costs, and Uber’s CTO reportedly torched the entire 2026 AI budget on “token” fees, the comment section went full audit mode. One user deadpanned that at some point it’s cheaper to “entertain humans” than feed machines, while another roasted today’s bots for getting stuck in “Ralph Wiggum loops.” Ouch.

Meanwhile, Swan AI’s CEO bragged about their giant Anthropic bill—“scaling with intelligence, not headcount”—and the crowd promptly turned it into a meme: flexing your cloud receipt is so 2024. With Gartner predicting $6.31 trillion in IT spending by 2026, skeptics say the math still doesn’t add up. “How many tokens can you extract from an employee per day?” one commenter asked, arguing that humans are the better bargain for now.

The debate splits fast: an OpenAI investor says their code tool is more efficient than a rival, shaving costs; others fire back that there’s no solid proof AI boosts productivity overall. Add in rising prices, paywalled features, and shifting tiers, and the vibe is clear: what was a flex is turning into a liability. Commenters dropped receipts and links, jokes, and a hard reality check—if AI can’t prove real returns by earnings call season, budgets will ghost it.

Key Points

  • Some companies report AI compute and token costs exceeding employee salary expenses.
  • Uber’s CTO reportedly exhausted the company’s 2026 AI budget due to token costs, per The Information.
  • Gartner forecasts worldwide IT spending will reach $6.31 trillion in 2026, up 13.5% from 2025, driven by AI-related demand.
  • Enterprises face pressure to prove ROI on AI spending, including productivity gains and clear metrics.
  • OpenAI’s Codex is viewed by an investor as more token-efficient than Anthropic’s Claude Code; Anthropic has adjusted pricing amid demand.

Hottest takes

“At a certain cost entertaining humans will be more cost effective” — oaiey
“How many tokens can you extract from an employee per day?” — protocolture
“I haven’t seen any good study that showed AI to actually improve productivity overall” — fxtentacle
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.