People Hate AI Art

Even the comments are dragging the robot dinosaur disaster

TLDR: A writer argued that using AI-made images makes people judge you instantly, and their goofy thumbs-up T-Rex became a symbol of everything critics find tacky about it. In the comments, some readers cheered the takedown while others said the hate is overblown and most people simply do not care.

A spicy blog post declaring that people hate AI-made pictures lit up the comment section, and honestly, the crowd may be the main event. The author’s argument was brutally simple: if you use an AI image for your blog, presentation, or brand, a lot of people instantly think you have bad taste, bad instincts, or both. To prove it, they compared an AI-made thumbs-up T-Rex with a janky paint edit, a handmade doodle, and paid art from a real artist — and claimed the messy human-made versions win on pure vibes every time.

The comments quickly turned into a mini culture war. One camp yelled “correct, no notes”. User olivierestsage called the post “right over the target” and “cathartic,” basically cheering from the stands while the anti-AI crowd booed the robot lizard offstage. Another commenter, bluefirebrand, delivered the funniest burn of the thread: the terrible little paint edit may actually have taken less effort than wrestling with prompts to get the uncanny dinosaur image in the first place.

But the pushback arrived fast. RcouF1uZ4gsC argued this is just a loud minority, saying most regular people probably don’t care and comparing the backlash to old fears about photography replacing painting. Then ekianjo came in swinging with a blunt “You have no idea what AI art is these days,” which is comment-section language for: prepare for battle. Meanwhile, one thoughtful voice tried to steer things back to real-world creativity, saying art is worth investing time in and that social proof still matters if you want people to trust the work behind an image. In other words: the dinosaur was fake, but the drama was extremely real.

Key Points

  • The article uses a ChatGPT-generated image of a thumbs-up T-Rex as its starting example of AI-generated art.
  • It argues that using AI-generated art in blogs, presentations, or business materials can create negative audience impressions.
  • The author proposes manual image editing as one alternative, citing a T-Rex image from Jurassic Park Wiki edited with jspaint.app.
  • The article also recommends hand-drawn doodles and commissioned artwork, including an example commissioned from dsoart.com on Bluesky.
  • A final, satirical section says AI imagery can function as a filtering tool in grifts by appealing to less critical audiences.

Hottest takes

"Crafting the prompt to make the original image probably took more time than that crappy mspaint job." — bluefirebrand
"Most people probably don’t care." — RcouF1uZ4gsC
"You have no idea what 'AI art' is these days." — ekianjo
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.