May 11, 2026
Compile me shocked
If AI Writes Your Code, Why Use Python?
AI made the nerdy languages cool, and the comments are absolutely losing it
TLDR: The article argues AI now makes faster, trickier programming languages much easier to use, which could weaken Python’s longtime advantage. Commenters were split between hype over AI-assisted Go and Rust, and eye-rolling from people who say real-world slowdowns come from databases, networks, and even Medium pop-ups.
The big claim in Noah Mitchem’s piece is deliciously dramatic: if artificial intelligence can now write the once-"hard" programming languages, why are so many people still clinging to Python? The article points to a wave of flashy examples — Microsoft moving the TypeScript engine to Go for a huge speed boost, researchers using swarms of AI helpers to build a C compiler in Rust, and veteran coders saying projects that once took months now take weeks. Translation for normal humans: the slow-but-easy tools may be losing their biggest advantage, because AI is making the fast-but-fussy tools much less painful.
But the real fireworks were in the comments, where readers split into camps almost instantly. One side was basically yelling, “Sure, cute story — but my app is waiting on the internet and the database, not the programming language,” with one commenter bluntly arguing they get nothing extra from forcing Rust into their workflow. Another camp was fully in their “AI picked Go and I loved it” era, with one reader gleefully admitting Claude chose Go for a side project and it worked so well they didn’t even need to know the language themselves.
And then came the side-quest chaos: people got almost more mad about Medium than about Python. One commenter roasted the site’s full-screen pop-up so hard it became the thread’s comic relief, basically saying the article about the future of coding was defeated by a giant annoying box. In other words: the future may be AI-written Rust, but the present is still internet users rage-posting about bad reading experiences and debating whether speed actually matters at all.
Key Points
- •The article argues that AI coding tools are reducing the historical development-cost advantage of Python and TypeScript over faster systems languages such as Rust and Go.
- •It says Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1, and DeepSeek V4 each exceeded 80% on SWE-bench Verified by April 2026.
- •The article cites Microsoft’s Go rewrite of the TypeScript compiler and says TypeScript 7.0 beta is roughly 10x faster than 6.0.
- •It says Nicholas Carlini used 16 parallel Claude agents to produce a Rust-based C compiler of about 100,000 lines that boots Linux 6.9 on x86, ARM, and RISC-V.
- •The article also cites Steve Klabnik’s Rue project and Andreas Kling’s two-week port of Ladybird’s JavaScript engine from C++ to Rust as examples of AI-assisted systems programming.