I Bypassed Adobe and Microsoft to Build a Git-Tracked Book Production Pipeline

Author ditches big publishing apps, and the comments instantly turn into a nerd cage match

TLDR: A writer replaced pricey book-making software with a home-built, trackable workflow using mostly free tools. Commenters split hard between cheering the escape from messy publishing apps and rolling their eyes that this is old news for programmers and print pros.

A novelist-dev just told the internet he walked away from Adobe and Microsoft to build his own book-making system using free tools and version tracking, basically treating a novel like software. On paper, it’s a classic rebel story: one person tired of expensive, clunky publishing workflows decides to stitch together a cleaner, cheaper way to make print books and ebooks. But in the comments, the real plot twist is that readers couldn’t decide whether to applaud, nitpick, or roast him lovingly.

Some were genuinely impressed. One commenter was almost distracted by the fact that the author apparently also wrote multiple Christian historical novels, calling that feat impressive before you even get to the tech side. Another self-publisher jumped in with a battle-scarred “same here,” saying the usual route from Word documents to print and ebook files is a painful mess, especially when tiny edits have to be repeated in multiple places.

Then came the inevitable internet energy: “Um, academics have been doing this forever.” One of the spiciest replies basically framed the whole article as a regular office worker “discovering” old-school computer habits years late. Ouch. Meanwhile, a commercial print veteran pushed back from the opposite angle, arguing the author may be overstating how broken traditional workflows are because pros already know ways to automate much of this.

And yes, there was peak nerd comedy too: a mini side-quest about whether text should use hard wraps or soft wraps, which is the sort of argument that sounds boring until you realize people are passionately debating line breaks like it’s a family feud. In other words, the community verdict is deliciously split: heroic DIY breakthrough or very online reinvention of the wheel?

Key Points

  • The author says his fiction projects were initially written and maintained as Microsoft Word DOCX files, which served as the source of truth for editing and production.
  • The article describes Adobe InDesign as the industry-standard print-layout tool and says the author used it to achieve professional typesetting quality beyond Word's capabilities.
  • The author argues that Word has limitations for print formatting, including weaker hyphenation and justification and the absence of microtypography features.
  • For ebook production, the article says the tool landscape is less standardized than print and highlights Calibre as a significant ebook tool.
  • The piece presents a shift toward a sustainable, Git-tracked publishing workflow using tools such as LibreOffice, Standard Ebooks, and LaTeX to reduce reliance on proprietary software.

Hottest takes

"AKA what CS PhD students have been doing ~forever." — kyboren
"The Word to PDF X-1/a to epub/kindle pipeline is painful" — diamondap
"My only problem using git and a text editor is deciding whether I want hard or soft wraps." — helterskelter
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.