May 26, 2026

Commit crimes, not commit ads

Stop Advertising in Your Commits

Coders are fighting over whether AI labels are honesty or just free brand spam

TLDR: A developer is calling out AI tool labels in code submissions as unpaid advertising and wants them kept out of commit messages. The community split fast: some say those labels are annoying brand spam, while others argue they’re a necessary honesty tag showing a bot helped write the code.

A programmer lit the match with a gloriously blunt rant: stop stuffing company shout-outs into code history. In their view, tags like “assisted by” and joke signatures are basically little ads sneaking into places meant for useful notes, and open-source developers are bizarrely giving giant companies free promotion while often paying them subscription fees too. The post’s vibe was simple: disclose it elsewhere if you must, but keep the commit clean. And yes, the anti-ad energy was scorching hot.

But the comments? That’s where the real popcorn started. One camp said the labels are not ads at all, but important honesty labels—a way of telling teammates, “Hey, a bot helped write this.” Others went even further and treated the tag like a warning sticker: if someone leaves an AI credit in place, maybe that means they didn’t think hard enough about what they were submitting. Ouch. Then came the tinfoil-hat-but-maybe-not theory: one commenter suggested these tags could be a sneaky way for AI companies to harvest feedback by comparing what the tool suggested with what humans actually changed later. Suddenly, a boring footer turned into a mini surveillance thriller.

And of course, the thread got its comedy gold. The deadpan “Sent from my iPhone” callback was the perfect punchline, comparing AI commit tags to those infamous automatic email signatures everyone loves to hate. The whole fight basically became: transparency or tacky branding? Either way, the community was very ready to throw tomatoes.

Key Points

  • The article objects to branded AI-tool attributions being added to commit metadata and messages.
  • It frames phrases like tool-assisted signatures in commits as advertising rather than technical information.
  • The author says developers may be promoting companies for free even when paying those companies subscription fees.
  • The article recommends disclosing AI-tool use in merge requests instead of commit history, or using a generic phrase such as "generated by an LLM."
  • The author links to a separate post explaining a broader opposition to AI programming tools.

Hottest takes

“a useful signal that the person did not think deeply” — aleda145
“It’s not advertising, it’s disclosure” — lifis
“Sent from my iPhone” — pkamb
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.