June 1, 2026
Commit message: total meltdown
GitHub and the Crime Against Software
Users say GitHub is chasing AI sparkle while the house catches fire
TLDR: A furious post accuses GitHub of repeated failures, hidden problems, and putting artificial intelligence features ahead of basic reliability. In the comments, users mostly nod along, joke like it’s a sermon, and some are already plotting backup homes for their projects on rival platforms.
The internet is absolutely not having a calm one over this anti-GitHub rant. The post accuses the code-hosting giant of hiding outages, breaking basic features, bloating its site, and obsessing over shiny artificial intelligence tools while everyday users wrestle with slow pages, crashing tabs, and settings that seem to change on their own. In plain English: people are saying the website many developers rely on to store and share software feels less like solid infrastructure and more like a chaotic mall renovation that never ends.
And the comments? Pure fed-up energy. One of the biggest applause lines came from a user quoting Charlie Munger: incentives run everything. Translation: commenters think GitHub and parent company Microsoft are doing exactly what makes them the most money and buzz, even if reliability suffers. Another commenter didn’t just complain — they posted a mini escape plan, urging people to mirror their projects to GitLab and Codeberg, turning frustration into a low-key breakup guide. Meanwhile, one critic zeroed in on GitHub’s own public updates, noting how often words like “Copilot” show up compared with anything about speed or stability, which became the thread’s main dunk: AI gets the spotlight, users get the spinning wheel.
There was even accidental comedy. One reply simply said “Amen,” as if the thread were a sermon for the technologically betrayed. Another person complained the article itself was hard to read, proving that on the internet, even the mob has a heckler in the back row.
Key Points
- •The article claims GitHub experiences dozens of publicly acknowledged incidents each month and argues the true number is likely higher.
- •The article says GitHub does not provide a public bug list or issues page and alleges that its uptime claims and priorities conflict with actual service reliability.
- •It argues GitHub and Microsoft have increased platform load through AI and "agentic" features while prioritizing those features over reliability.
- •The article describes repeated browser compatibility and front-end performance problems, especially on Firefox and Safari, including RAM-heavy pull request and review pages.
- •It criticizes GitHub Actions, default settings behavior, and repository integrity practices, including poor documentation, memory-heavy logs, naive caching, and tolerance of star-buying and follower-buying.