Ask HN: High school student – is learning programming still worthwhile?

Teen asks if coding is dead, and the internet rushes in with tough love

TLDR: A student asked whether learning programming still makes sense now that artificial intelligence can build simple apps. The community’s answer: probably yes, because tools can help with typing code, but understanding how things actually work still matters—and nobody trusts online hype to predict the next 20 years.

A high school student showed up on Hacker News with a very 2026 panic: if artificial intelligence can already build apps, write code, and help beginners make money, is learning programming still even worth it? And the replies were part pep talk, part reality check, part accidental comedy roast. The very first burst of drama came from moderator dang, who welcomed the student but also dropped a spicy note: AI-written posts aren’t allowed there. Translation: in a thread about whether AI is taking over, the community immediately side-eyed the possibility that AI helped write the question. Brutal.

From there, commenters split into familiar camps. One group basically said, calm down, coding is not the same as building real-world products. They argued that typing instructions is only one small piece of the job, and that people still need to understand what they’re making so they can catch mistakes when the robot helper confidently invents nonsense. Another crowd went more philosophical: learning is still valuable even if the job market changes, just like people still learn math despite calculators existing.

The funniest twist? Some users warned that if you run away from computers into “safe” hands-on work like plumbing or electrical jobs, robots may eventually show up there too. So the mood was less “coding is dead” and more “nobody knows anything, please study what genuinely interests you.” Underneath the jokes and mini-scoldings, the loudest message was simple: don’t let social media hype pick your future for you.

Key Points

  • The student is evaluating possible majors and had previously seen EECS as an appealing STEM path.
  • They cite exposure to AI programming tools such as Claude Code and Codex as a reason for rethinking that choice.
  • The article states that these tools can generate websites, create software, assist with hardware problems, and help non-programmers build applications.
  • The student asks whether coding and computer science will remain valuable skills over the next 10 to 20 years if AI can perform many coding tasks.
  • The post expands the question to which academic fields may remain valuable or less affected as AI continues to change education and careers.

Hottest takes

"AI-edited / AI-generated text posts, including comments, aren't allowed on HN" — dang
"AI might ... be quite capable at coding, but it is still quite poor at software engineering" — Dansvidania
"We learn arithmetic despite having access to calculators" — dieselgate
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.