Who Runs Your Rust Future? Hands-On Intro to Async Rust

A plain-English guide wins fans, but the comments instantly turn into a mini war over whether we even need this lesson

TLDR: The article tries to make a confusing Rust programming idea feel practical by showing readers what’s happening behind the scenes, and the author openly says AI helped draft it. Commenters mostly loved the clarity, but a few sparked drama by arguing the tutorial already exists — or that this whole coding style should be skipped entirely.

A new hands-on guide to Rust’s famously confusing “async” world has landed, and the author came in with a surprisingly candid confession: yes, artificial intelligence helped write it. That could have triggered a full-blown comment-section riot, but instead the crowd mostly swerved into something rarer on the internet: actual appreciation. Readers praised the article’s clean writing, its calm design, and its talent for explaining a notoriously knotty topic in simple terms. One fan even said it helped them understand JavaScript’s engine flow better than before — a twist worthy of a crossover episode.

But of course, this being a tech crowd, peace lasted about five seconds. One commenter politely but unmistakably dropped the classic “this already exists” move, pointing to Tokio’s own async tutorial as proof the bridge between theory and practice may not be as undiscovered as advertised. Then came the real spice: a full anti-async drive-by. In the thread’s hottest contrarian moment, one user basically declared, forget this whole style of programming, just use threads instead — the kind of blunt take that makes developers sit up, squint, and start typing.

So the mood is deliciously mixed: admiration for the article’s friendly, human tone, curiosity about its AI-assisted creation, and the eternal programmer food fight over whether the tool being explained is secretly the wrong tool entirely. Educational post? Yes. Comment drama? Also yes.

Key Points

  • The author discloses using AI assistance for drafting explanations while retaining responsibility for structure, technical decisions, coding approach, and editing.
  • The article positions the series as a bridge between low-level Async Rust theory and practical use of the Tokio runtime.
  • The tutorial series intends to teach async internals by having readers build a future, waker, and executor before using Tokio.
  • The article assumes readers know JavaScript async/await and basic Rust features such as structs, enums, associated functions, and closures.
  • The article explains that JavaScript environments like Node.js provide an event loop for promises, while Rust provides no built-in event loop and therefore requires a runtime or custom executor.

Hottest takes

"There is actually already a tutorial at this level" — Twey
"The rust flow is so much more natural to me" — Quarrel
"Don't use async but use threads instead" — amelius
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.