June 20, 2026
Push, pull, and panic
Ask HN: Due to spam on GitHub, what platforms can I move my projects?
Fed-up coders eye GitHub exits as the crowd splits between "just host it yourself" and fresh new homes
TLDR: A frustrated developer asked where to move projects after too much spam on GitHub, with SourceHut pitched as a serious alternative. The comments quickly split between people saying to host your own code, people naming rivals like Codeberg and GitLab, and others warning that leaving GitHub could mean losing the community that makes projects thrive.
A simple question — where do you move your projects when GitHub spam gets unbearable? — instantly turned into a mini civil war over the future of coding online. The original poster came in waving the flag for SourceHut, praising its cheap price, long-term vibe, and its founder’s very public fight against artificial-intelligence scrapers. Translation for normal people: some developers are so tired of junk, bots, and big-platform chaos that they’re ready to pack up and move somewhere smaller, stricter, and a little more old-school.
But the comments? That’s where the real drama lives. One camp basically said, calm down, the answer is obvious: host it yourself. Veteran commenter comrade1234 delivered the grizzled-parent energy of the thread, saying they’ve quietly run their own setup for decades — while also admitting the ugly catch: the moment you want the public to show up, the spam shows up too. Another group tossed out rival destinations like Codeberg, Codefloe, and the predictable "just use GitLab" answer with the bluntness of someone dropping a mic and leaving.
The spiciest tension came from people asking a bigger question than spam: what’s the point of moving if you lose the crowd? One thoughtful commenter argued that a code-hosting site isn’t just storage — it’s where bug reports, help, and real human feedback happen. So the mood was equal parts escape plan, nostalgia trip, and digital neighborhood panic: everyone wants out of the noisy mall, but nobody wants to move to a ghost town.
Key Points
- •The article identifies SourceHut as a preferred alternative platform for hosting Git projects.
- •It says SourceHut is open source, can be self-hosted, and offers features such as CI/CD.
- •The post states that SourceHut is inexpensive and expected to improve over time.
- •The author says they are gradually moving projects from GitLab to SourceHut as a long-term plan.
- •The article argues that Git repositories do not need to be hosted on a platform because local repositories are complete copies that can be cloned or pushed anywhere with shell access.