June 22, 2026

Pen wars: now with branding beef

Why Drawing Tablet Brands Won't Collaborate on Linux Floss Drivers

Tablet brands ghost Linux fans, and the comments are absolutely roasting everyone involved

TLDR: Gaomon backed away from helping Linux tablet support because the project looked too connected to rival brand Wacom. Commenters are split between blaming stubborn companies and blaming the confusing Wacom-heavy naming, with many saying a rename could remove a surprisingly huge roadblock.

A volunteer reviewer tried to play peacemaker between drawing tablet brands and the people who make free Linux drivers, hoping companies like Gaomon, Huion, XpPen, and Ugee would simply share device info and make life easier for artists. Instead, the whole thing crashed into a surprisingly petty wall: branding drama. Gaomon ultimately said no, saying the project looked too tied to Wacom and that sharing specs into a Wacom-named ecosystem was a non-starter. Yes, the big plot twist here is that a folder name may have helped sink cross-brand cooperation.

And the comment section? Instant courtroom chaos. One camp basically yelled, "So rename the thing already!" with people arguing that if a Wacom label is scaring off rivals, then keeping that name is now an actual problem, not just old open-source trivia. Another commenter delivered the ultimate armchair CEO solution: fork the project, scrub the Wacom references, and move on. Problem solved, allegedly.

But the crowd also widened the roast. Some users pointed out this isn’t just a Linux problem — tablet makers already struggle to play nicely even on Windows, where drivers can clash like reality show contestants trapped in one house. Others complained that Linux’s tablet settings still feel bare-bones compared to Windows, especially for artists who want easy button remapping. The result is a deliciously messy community verdict: companies are being territorial, open-source naming is backfiring, and artists are stuck in the middle drawing with drama instead of drivers.

Key Points

  • The author used drawing tablet reviews on GNU/Linux with open-source software to gather hardware specifications and pass them to Red Hat developers working on Linux input support.
  • Because the review-and-driver-testing workflow was time-intensive, the author shifted strategy toward asking tablet brands to collaborate directly with Linux developers.
  • A discussion with Gaomon led to contact with a technical employee at Shenzhen Huion Trend Technology Co.,Ltd., which the author links to shared driver tooling across several tablet brands.
  • Gaomon later declined to participate in the Linux driver effort, saying the relevant project appeared Wacom-led and that sharing device specifications with Wacom was unacceptable.
  • The article argues that historical Wacom-branded repository names such as Libwacom and wacom-hid-descriptors create the impression that multi-vendor Linux tablet infrastructure belongs to Wacom.

Hottest takes

"If the project being named after Wacom is actively causing other companies to not contribute" — ndiddy
"fork and rename the project, strip all wacom references. then share w/ the other tablet brands. problem solved." — fouc
"you get to deal with weird bugs from their drivers fighting" — egypturnash
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.