June 25, 2026
Big Brother Has Entered The Chat
Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
Everyone hates mass spying until it’s their side holding the camera
TLDR: The article says governments, especially the US, have built systems to collect massive amounts of people’s data, often far beyond actual suspects. Commenters turned it into a brawl over hypocrisy, security, VPN motives, and whether mass spying is useless overreach or a necessary tool.
A privacy-focused company lit the fuse with a furious broadside against state surveillance, arguing that governments keep vacuuming up far too much information on ordinary people and calling it safety. The article points to the United States as a giant in the spying game, reviving the still-chilling Edward Snowden revelations about officials collecting huge amounts of data with limited oversight. In plain English: the warning is that governments are watching way beyond actual suspects, and many people think that should terrify everyone.
But the real fireworks were in the comments, where readers split into camps almost instantly. One joker planted the flag with the perfectly bleak gag, "We’re #1!" turning global surveillance into a nightmare Olympics. Another commenter went for hypocrisy as the main event, sneering that mass surveillance is suddenly acceptable when it’s wrapped in "age verification" and sold as protecting children. Then came the skeptics: one reader shrugged that the piece comes from a VPN company, basically saying, sure, they may have a point, but they also have something to sell. That same comment tossed in a spicy theory that governments may love artificial intelligence because no human could ever sift through this mountain of data alone.
And then the debate got sharper. One commenter flat-out challenged the article’s core claim, asking where the proof is that mass spying doesn’t stop terrorism, and demanding an alternative. That’s the comment-section showdown in one neat package: freedom vs fear, privacy vs security, and everyone accusing everyone else of wanting control.
Key Points
- •The article distinguishes commercial surveillance from state mass surveillance and says both are harmful, with a focus on surveillance conducted by governments.
- •The article says its company was founded in 2009 in response to expanding surveillance laws and advocates targeted surveillance with court oversight instead of mass surveillance.
- •The United States is presented as a major example of state surveillance, supported by quotes from intelligence and defense officials and by reference to NSA data-storage facilities in Utah.
- •Edward Snowden’s 2013 disclosures are described as the main source of documented evidence showing US authorities monitored hundreds of millions of people worldwide every day.
- •The article identifies Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as a legal basis for surveillance without court decisions and says it affects both non-Americans and Americans in practice.