July 3, 2026

Deleted by wiki, judged by comments

Odin, Wikipedia and Engagement Farming

Wikipedia axed Odin and the comments instantly turned into a nerd civil war

TLDR: Wikipedia removed Odin’s page because editors said it lacked enough trustworthy coverage, sparking a fight over whether the language is genuinely well-known or just famous in niche online circles. In the comments, people argued over broken rules, bubble hype, and even joked about fleeing to an alternate wiki.

Wikipedia deleted its page for Odin, a programming language made by GingerBill, after editors argued it wasn’t famous enough and didn’t have strong enough sources. That dry paperwork could have been the whole story — but the real fireworks were in the community reaction, where people split into camps almost immediately. One side basically yelled, “How can this be obscure?” while the other shrugged and said, “Honestly… I’ve never even heard of it.” That clash became the whole drama: is Odin secretly a big deal in its world, or just internet-famous inside a very online bubble?

The comments were a glorious mix of serious policy debate, confusion, and accidental comedy. One reader said the article made Odin sound huge, then dropped the killer line that they’d “never heard of it before,” which is exactly the kind of quote that pours gasoline on an already raging identity crisis. Another commenter zoomed out and argued the bigger problem is that Wikipedia’s rules were built for old-school media, while modern tech fame happens on YouTube, blogs, podcasts, and company websites. In other words: the internet thinks something is real long before Wikipedia agrees. And then came the comic relief — a deadpan plug for Grokipedia, a backup wiki option that felt like the comments section saying, “Fine, we’ll make our own Wikipedia.” Even the gripes about the article’s broken mobile layout added to the mess: somehow the page about deletion drama became a mini roast of the website too.

Key Points

  • The article reports that Wikipedia deleted the Odin programming language page after an Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • The quoted AfD rationale said Odin lacked in-depth coverage from reliable sources and relied on developer-controlled or self-published material.
  • The article includes a table of AfD actions from 23 to 31 March 2026 showing multiple delete and keep positions before the page was removed.
  • The author describes Odin as a visible 'C competitor' language and cites coverage by Primeagen and commercial use by JangaFX as examples.
  • The article says Odin creator GingerBill later commented publicly and thanked Brodie Robertson for a video about Wikipedia deleting programming pages.

Hottest takes

"I've never heard of it before" — dibujaron
"there's always" — smitty1e
"meshes poorly with Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources and notability" — andai
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.