Abject Praise

Apple gets applause for doing the basics — and the comments are not having it

TLDR: The article says Apple’s Safari browser is still lagging behind competitors even while Apple markets its progress like a big win. Commenters turned that into a roast, mocking both Apple’s slow catch-up and, hilariously, the fact that Apple can’t even do its own signature squircle shape.

The latest flare-up in the browser wars is less about Apple’s new software update and more about whether Apple deserves a gold star for finally fixing old problems. The article argues that Apple’s Safari browser is still improving more slowly than rivals, even as Apple’s marketing celebrates its progress. In plain English: critics say Apple is acting like the class hero for handing in homework everyone else finished ages ago.

And the comment section? Deliciously split between eye-rolls, snark, and drive-by comedy. One camp basically said, “Calm down and just build websites more simply,” with one commenter bluntly declaring, “If not all browsers support a feature, don’t use it… ask your LLM.” That got instant applause from another reader: “Yow! Well said.” Translation: some people think developers are overcomplicating things and should stop waiting for Apple to catch up.

But the funniest hit came from a commenter who spotted the most Apple-shaped irony imaginable: Apple’s own browser apparently doesn’t support the ‘squircle’ corner shape, the rounded-square style that screams Apple design. That joke practically writes itself. Meanwhile, another reader skipped the technical fight entirely and went after the author’s wording, sneering that “rubbishing” is a terrible word. So yes, the debate somehow became part browser standards fight, part grammar police convention.

The real mood here is clear: people are tired of Apple being praised for incremental catch-up, and the community is serving that frustration with sarcasm, nitpicks, and some truly premium petty energy.

Key Points

  • The article examines Apple’s Safari 27 and iOS 27 marketing and argues that the release reflects a comparatively slow browser update cycle.
  • It uses Web Platform Tests data from wpt.fyi to compare Safari, Firefox, and Chromium experimental and stable builds.
  • The article states that Apple requires competing browser engines on iOS in the EU and Japan to pass at least 90% of WPT tests, while Safari only narrowly exceeds that threshold.
  • It reports that over the prior year Apple shipped seven releases, while Mozilla and Chromium each shipped 12 stable releases.
  • Using time-weighted calculations and a July 2025 to July 2026 comparison, the article concludes that Safari/WebKit improved more slowly than Firefox and Chromium.

Hottest takes

"If not all browsers support a feature, don’t use it... ask your LLM" — tgv
"Apple... does not currently support the squircle corner shape" — madibo3156
"‘Rubbishing’ is a worthless gerund" — oasisbob
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.