July 18, 2026
Bot counts to three, gets five
Roko's Dancing Basilisk
AI writes 30 pages, fumbles basic counting, and the comments instantly go feral
TLDR: A blogger tried an AI tool that wrote detailed docs for his old website code, and it was good enough to find real bugs—while also hilariously messing up basic counting. In the comments, fans said critics are using weak AI and whining, while skeptics dismissed the whole post with a blunt eye-roll.
A blogger fed his long-running personal site code into DeepWiki, an artificial intelligence tool that auto-creates explainers for software projects, and the result was the kind of chaotic win that the internet lives for. On one hand, he was genuinely impressed: the bot spat out nearly 30 pages, correctly described how big parts of his ancient code worked, and even helped him spot two real issues hiding in plain sight. On the other hand, the machine also delivered the now-iconic own goal of claiming there were "three primary layers" while proudly drawing five. That tiny math fail became the perfect mascot for the whole experiment: weirdly smart, weirdly sloppy, impossible to ignore.
And then came the comments, where the real show started. One camp was basically yelling, stop blaming the robot if you’re using bargain-bin brains, with one commenter exploding, “What the hell are these people doing?” and accusing critics of testing old, weak models and acting shocked when the results are bad. The other side was much frostier, with a drive-by dismissal saying the blog title was bad and linking readers straight to DeepWiki’s docs instead, like a digital eye-roll in hyperlink form.
The funniest part? The original post was already dripping with grumpy charm, from complaining about vanishing scroll bars to roasting tiny unreadable diagrams. So the vibe became less “Is AI perfect?” and more “Is this surprisingly useful nonsense, or just polished confusion?” The crowd, naturally, chose both.
Key Points
- •The article tests DeepWiki by generating documentation for the author's mod_blog GitHub repository.
- •The author reports that DeepWiki produced nearly 30 pages of documentation and that much of the overview was accurate.
- •One structural inconsistency in the generated output was a claim of three primary layers alongside a diagram showing five layers.
- •The author identifies several documentation errors and omissions involving configuration handling, RSS version, Lua usage, SUID behavior, and posthook failure handling.
- •Reviewing the generated documentation helped the author identify two code issues in mod_blog: one actual bug related to file locking and caching, and one literal-constant usage issue.