August 1, 2026
Math hype or math cap?
Assessment of open AI math results
AI says it made math history, but the comments section is absolutely not buying it
TLDR: Two AI systems rated one math result as a possible major breakthrough and several others as big advances, but readers immediately questioned whether that means much. The comments split between confusion, mockery, and meme-level skepticism about AI effectively grading AI.
The big claim here is simple enough for non-math people: someone used two chatbots, Fable 5 and Sol, to judge a batch of new AI math results using Epoch AI’s scoring guide. Both bots agreed that result #3 looked like a full-on "Breakthrough", the kind of thing mathematicians everywhere would care about, not just specialists. They also said several others were big deals, with extra drama over whether a few should be called merely strong results or almost-history-making ones.
But the real fireworks came from the community, where the mood swung hard from curiosity to outright eye-rolls. One commenter brutally dismissed the whole exercise as "slop assessments," basically saying this wasn’t a real evaluation at all, just one AI asking another AI to grade itself. Ouch. Another user played the confused everyman, asking what any of these flashy scores actually changed in the real world — a fair question, and one that quietly undercuts all the hype.
And then came the meme artillery. The thread’s funniest drive-by was the classic "Obama awarding Obama" joke, summing up the suspicion that this looked less like independent review and more like AI handing trophies to AI. So yes, the article tries to rank math glory, but the comments turned it into a much juicier referendum on trust, hype, and whether anyone should take robot report cards seriously.
Key Points
- •The author used GPT-5.6 Sol Pro and Fable 5 Max to classify open AI math results with Epoch AI Research’s OpenMath rubric.
- •The rubric in the article defines three tiers: Solid Result, Major Advance, and Breakthrough.
- •Both AI systems agreed that result #3 was a Breakthrough.
- •The article states that both systems agreed at least seven results were Major Advances, with disagreement only noted for #7.
- •The article cites Epoch AI’s guidance that borderline cases should be judged conservatively and says Fable 5 marked #1, #4, and #9 as Borderline Breakthroughs.