August 4, 2026
iSue, youSue, we all stare
Apple is getting this wrong
OpenAI blasts Apple in public, and the comments instantly turn into a courtroom food fight
TLDR: OpenAI says Apple’s lawsuit is built on mistakes, including emailing the wrong person and misrepresenting past contact. Commenters are split between loving the drama and rolling their eyes, with many saying the real story is how chaotic and sloppy both companies look.
OpenAI didn’t just answer Apple’s lawsuit — it grabbed a megaphone. In a sharply worded post, the company says Apple mixed up names, emailed the wrong person, claimed a legal talk that never happened, then waited months before suing anyway. OpenAI also says Apple’s own staff asked former employee Chang Liu for help finding files after he left, which made commenters immediately ask the most embarrassing question of all: how are both giant companies this messy with employee accounts? One reader called the whole thing “amateur,” and honestly, that became a major theme.
But the real fireworks were in the crowd reaction. A big chunk of people were not buying anyone’s halo. One camp basically said, cool story, now show us the rest of the evidence — with one commenter openly saying they had their “popcorn ready for discovery” and wanted this to go all the way to trial. Another camp was even harsher, saying OpenAI’s public blog post felt weirdly emotional for an active court fight, like a company trying to win the internet instead of the judge. The title itself, “Apple is getting this wrong,” got roasted as sounding more like a subtweet than a legal response.
And yes, the jokes wrote themselves. Between “Trumpian tantrum” comparisons, side-eye over reused iCloud accounts, and the general vibe of Silicon Valley adults behaving like feuding group chat mods, commenters turned a dry legal dispute into a full-on drama binge.
Key Points
- •OpenAI published a statement on August 3, 2026 disputing Apple’s lawsuit and calling Apple’s account of events inaccurate.
- •The post says Apple admitted its outside lawyers emailed the wrong person in February and conceded that no discussion with OpenAI’s General Counsel had occurred.
- •OpenAI says Apple did not raise the specific lawsuit allegations in earlier communications and instead said it was “resolving any issues” before going silent for five months.
- •OpenAI argues Apple employees contacted former Apple employee Chang Liu after his departure to help locate information, and says any continued access reflected Apple’s access-management failures.
- •OpenAI says Apple’s preliminary injunction request is unnecessary because OpenAI does not have or want Apple’s trade secrets.