Blog about things you don't understand yet

Write first, understand later? Readers are split between genius advice and internet nonsense

TLDR: The blogger argues that writing about something before you fully grasp it is the best way to learn, as long as you take a clear position and do the research. Commenters were fiercely split: some called it the best thinking tool around, while others said the internet already has more than enough confused people posting confidently.

A blogger just tossed out a delightfully provocative rule for writing online: don’t wait until you fully understand a topic — write your way into understanding it. Their pitch is simple: every good post should argue something, be at least a little controversial, and force the writer to do enough homework to survive the obvious backlash. In other words, blogging isn’t just self-expression — it’s a public workout for your brain. And yes, that instantly set off the comment section.

The community reaction was a mini soap opera. One camp basically said, "obviously!" Writing is how you find out whether your ideas actually make sense, with one commenter comparing it to lifting weights for the mind. But the anti-camp came in hot: please, absolutely not, said one critic, arguing the internet is already drowning in people — and now chatbots — confidently posting half-baked takes. Ouch. Another commenter didn’t even get to the philosophy because they got sidetracked by the title, joking they were disappointed to discover it was a command, not a confession. Classic internet behavior.

Then came the existential dread subplot: one former blogger said they used to do exactly this, but shut their site down because the audience was basically just bots. That turned the whole discussion from “how should we write?” into “is publishing online even worth it anymore?” So the real drama here isn’t just whether writing helps you think — it’s whether the web still deserves your thoughts in the first place.

Key Points

  • The author says each published blog post should produce new learning during the writing process, not just express what was already known.
  • The article describes an argument-driven blogging style in which every post advances a specific point rather than offering unstructured reflections.
  • The author uses examples from posts about o3, C2PA, and the Luddites to show how research during writing changed or expanded the original idea.
  • The article argues that constraints, including taking a contestable position, make blogging easier and more productive by narrowing focus.
  • The author says writing frequently exposes unclear thinking, improves conclusions, and can change the writer’s original opinion.

Hottest takes

"the title was imperative rather than descriptive" — demibabs
"99% of my blog's traffic was bots, so I shut it down" — stackghost
"Please, no. Don't blog about things you don't understand yet" — Animats
Made with <3 by @siedrix and @shesho from CDMX. Powered by Forge&Hive.